Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Understanding Attitude, Practice and Knowledge of Infectious Bronchitis Disease Among Poultry Farmers in Federal Capital Territory - Nigeria

Received: 5 August 2025     Accepted: 16 September 2025     Published: 28 November 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study, involving 120 poultry farmers (82.00% male, 18.00% female) raising layers (63.00%), broilers (35.00%), and mixed flocks (2.00%) with sizes from 200 to 100,000 birds, investigated the interplay between knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) and the occurrence of Infectious Bronchitis (IB) in poultry. A critical observation was that vaccine administration, a key preventive measure, was often entrusted to farm attendants (45.00%) who may lack adequate understanding of biological material handling, potentially leading to vaccine failure and disease spread. While 45.00% of respondents limited their IB vaccination knowledge to laying birds, 55.00% understood its relevance to all bird types. Despite 95.00% acknowledging the economic impact of IB, 48.30% did not vaccinate against IB after 3-in-1 administration, and 23.30% had no vaccination history. Although all farmers kept medication records, only 25.00% consistently screened for maternal derived antibodies, a practice crucial for effective vaccination scheduling. Furthermore, a notable portion of farmers (15.00% strongly disagreed, 5.00% disagreed) lacked knowledge regarding the importance of priming birds before 3-in-1 vaccination. The findings show a critical need for increased awareness among poultry farmers, particularly concerning comprehensive vaccination protocols for all bird types, accurate disease recognition beyond clinical signs, and the significance of practices like maternal derived antibody screening to effectively mitigate IB and its economic consequences.

Published in Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Volume 13, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12
Page(s) 179-185
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Vaccination, Infectious Bronchitis, Maternal Derived Antibodies, Poultry, FCT, Nigeria

1. Introduction
Infectious Bronchitis (IB) is globally recognized as one of the most economically significant poultry diseases, causing acute, highly contagious viral infections primarily in chickens. Its clinical manifestations extend beyond respiratory distress, which includes tracheal rales, coughing, and sneezing, to encompass declines in egg production and quality, kidney damage, enteritis, and pectoral myopathy .
The profound economic importance of IB is evident in its detrimental effects on the weight gain, feed efficiency, and overall quality and quantity of eggs and meat produced . In Nigeria, the rapidly expanding poultry industry faces significant constraints from several viral diseases , including Newcastle disease, infectious bursal disease, and avian infectious bronchitis. These diseases not only reduce animal productivity but also cause a decline in output, increase production costs, and lead to a reduction in profit . A study by Mohamadou et al. (2010) estimated that livestock diseases impose an annual financial burden of approximately ₦29.2 billion on Nigeria's agricultural economy, highlighting their substantial impact.
The growing number of Avain Infectious Bronchitis disease (IB) outbreaks necessitated this study. Given the significant economic threat posed by Infectious Bronchitis to the burgeoning Nigerian poultry industry, particularly in regions like the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, understanding the human element in disease control is paramount. This research article aims to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of poultry farmers in FCT, Abuja, regarding Infectious Bronchitis. By assessing current farmer awareness, vaccination strategies, and management approaches, this study seeks to identify gaps in knowledge and practice that may contribute to disease prevalence and economic losses. The findings will provide crucial insights for developing targeted educational programs and interventions to enhance disease recognition, improve vaccination protocols, and strengthen biosecurity measures, ultimately contributing to the sustainable growth and profitability of the poultry sector in Nigeria.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Abuja is where the study was conducted. The position lies between longitude 7.580 East and latitude 9.060 North. Abuja has a land area of 8,000 square kilometers and is located in the center of Nigeria. It shares borders with the states of Kogi on the south-west, Nasarawa on the east and south-east, Kaduna on the north, and Niger on the west (See Figure 1).
Figure 1. Map showing the study location.
2.2. Questionnaire
A structured questionnaire was developed and pre-tested to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of poultry farmers regarding Infectious Bronchitis (IB). The questionnaire, which was administered to 120 farmers, was composed of closed-ended, multiple-choice questions designed to collect data on various aspects of IB. The questionnaire also captured information on farmers' vaccination practices, their attitudes towards IB prevention, and their awareness of the disease's economic impact. The questionnaires were administered both at the farmers' locations and to walk-in farmers at the Animal Care Lab in Abuja.
3. Results
3.1. Respondent’s Background Information
A total number of 120 respondents; Out of the 120 respondents, 82.00% are males while 18.00% are females, the birds type raised by the respondents were 63.00% Layers, 35.00% broilers and 2.00% mixed birds farming (Broilers and Layers) Flock size ranges from 200 to 100,000 birds.
3.2. Farm Operation History with Infectious Bronchitis
The findings reveal several key practices and experiences among the poultry farmers surveyed. When it came to vaccine administration, 45% of the respondents entrusted this task to farm attendants, while veterinarians and farm owners were responsible for 40% and 15% of the cases, respectively. A vast majority of farmers (88.33%) acquired their vaccines from a veterinary pharmaceutical outfit, with the remaining 11.67% having them supplied directly to the farm by a veterinarian.
All surveyed farmers (100%) maintained a medication schedule for their birds, though only 73.33% included Infectious Bronchitis (IB) on their schedule. While 25% of respondents consistently screened their birds for maternal derived antibodies, 55% never performed this screening, and 20% did so only sometimes. Furthermore, 48.33% of respondents reported not vaccinating their birds against IB after a 3-in-1 administration, and 23.33% had no history of vaccination at all.
Regarding disease prevalence, 28.33% of the farms had previously experienced an IB outbreak, while 71.67% had not, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Frequency of Farm history/operations with regards to Infectious bronchitis in Abuja.

Variables

Category

Responses

Frequency (120)

Percentage (%)

Maternal derived antibody screening for Infectious Bronchitis

Yes

30

25.00

No

66

55.00

Sometime

24

20.00

Administration of Vaccine

Livestock/Farm owner

18

15.00

Veterinary Doctor

48

40.00

Farm attendant

54

45.00

Vaccine Purchase source

Veterinary Pharmaceutical Shop

106

88.33

Supplied by Veterinarian

14

11.67

Do you have a medication schedule?

Yes

120

100

No

0

0

Infectious bronchitis vaccination on vaccination schedule

Yes

88

73.33

No

32

26.67

When last were your birds administered with Infectious Bronchitis Vaccine?

A month ago

24

20.00

Within a week

10

8.33

Not at all

28

23.33

None after 3 in 1

58

48.33

Experienced drop in production and respiratory distress after IBV Vaccination

Yes

36

30.00

No

84

70.00

Which hatchery are your Birds from?

Branded hatchery

120

100

Unbranded hatchery

0

0

Do you keep records of treatment history on your Birds?

Yes

120

100

No

0

0

Experienced infectious bronchitis outbreak before?

Yes

34

28.33

No

86

71.67

3.3. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Respondents
Of the 120 respondents, 83.33% reported having heard of IB, while 16.67% had not. The majority of respondents (95.00%) agreed that IB could lead to economic loss, while 5.00% stated otherwise. Furthermore, 91.67% of the respondents considered it necessary to vaccinate birds against IB, whereas 8.33% did not.
Regarding vaccination knowledge, 45.83% of respondents had knowledge about vaccination only for laying birds, and 54.17% of respondents' knowledge extended to all bird types. All respondents (100.00%) affirmed that biosecurity is essential for the control and prevention of IB.
The survey also assessed the perceived effects of IB on product quality. A total of 86.67% of respondents agreed that IB could affect the quality of meat and eggs, with 13.33% stating it could not.
When asked about the susceptibility of different bird types to IB, 23.33% of respondents strongly agreed that all kinds of poultry birds are affected. With respect to specific vaccination practices, 5.00% of the respondents strongly agreed that IB vaccination should only be performed on laying birds, and another 5.00% strongly agreed that routine vaccination is unnecessary after the 3-in-1 administration.
On the topic of priming birds before 3-in-1 vaccination, 21.67% of respondents strongly agreed that it is necessary, 30.00% agreed, 5.00% disagreed, and 15.00% strongly disagreed, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 2. Frequency of Poultry Farmers Knowledge and practices in relation to Avian Infectious Bronchitis disease in FCT.

Variables

Category

Responses

Frequency (120)

Percentage (%)

Heard about Infectious Bronchitis Disease in poultry before?

Yes

100

83.33

No

20

16.67

Can Infectious bronchitis cause economic loss to your farm

Yes

114

95.00

No

6

5.00

Necessary to vaccinate birds against infectious bronchitis?

Yes

110

91.67

No

10

8.33

IBV vaccination is only necessary in laying birds?

Yes

55

45.83

No

65

54.17

Good biosecurity measures help to reduce the spread of Infectious bronchitis?

Yes

120

100

No

0

0

Infectious bronchitis viral disease can affect the quality of broiler meat and egg quality.

Yes

104

86.67

No

16

13.33

Table 3. Frequency of poultry farmer’s Knowledge and practices in relation to Infectious Bronchitis in FCT.

Variables

Category

Responses Frequency (120)

Percentage (%)

Infectious bronchitis is a disease of all kind of poultry birds?

Strongly disagree

14

11.67

Disagree

18

15.00

Neutral

30

25.00

Agree

30

25.00

strongly agree

28

23.33

IB vaccination should only be carried out in laying birds

Strongly disagree

30

25.00

Disagree

44

36.67

Neutral

10

8.33

Agree

30

25.00

strongly agree

6

5.00

No need for routine Infectious bronchitis vaccination after 3 in 1

Strongly disagree

28

23.33

Disagree

22

18.33

Neutral

34

28.33

Agree

30

25.00

strongly agree

6

5.00

Drop in production in laying birds is due to Newcastle disease and Egg drop syndrome only

Strongly disagree

24

20.00

Disagree

40

33.33

Neutral

26

21.67

Agree

28

23.33

strongly agree

2

1.67

Infectious bronchitis bronchitis can cause respiratory disease in poultry birds

Strongly disagree

16

13.33

Disagree

12

10.00

Neutral

26

21.67

Agree

36

30.00

strongly agree

30

25.00

Prime birds before 3 in 1 vaccination

Strongly disagree

18

15.00

Disagree

6

5.00

Neutral

34

28.33

Agree

36

30.00

strongly agree

26

21.67

4. Discussion
A key finding of this study is the significant discrepancy between farmers' perceived incidence of Infectious Bronchitis (28.33%) and the high seroprevalence rates (consistently >80%) reported across Nigeria. This suggests that IB is likely endemic and widely under-recognized based on clinical signs alone, posing a silent but significant threat to the poultry industry. This finding aligns with established serological data from various regions, which show widespread exposure even in unvaccinated free-range birds: 90.7% in FCT , 82.95% in Plateau State , 84% in Sokoto State , and 82.7% in Southwestern Nigeria . This under-recognition of IB is compounded by several critical gaps in farmer knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). Effective disease management hinges on farmers possessing accurate information and consistently implementing appropriate measures, which can significantly mitigate the spread and impact of IB among poultry birds.
Vaccination is a cornerstone of IB prevention and control . However, our survey revealed that a substantial proportion of respondents (45.00%) delegate vaccine administration to farm handlers. This practice raises concerns, as these handlers may possess limited understanding of proper biological material handling, potentially leading to vaccine failure and subsequent disease outbreaks. Such inadequate administration can compromise the efficacy of vaccination programs, allowing the virus to circulate and spread.
The study also shows a notable gap in farmers' knowledge regarding the scope of IB vaccination. While 45.83% of respondents believed IB vaccination was exclusively necessary for laying birds, 54.17% correctly understood its relevance to all poultry types. This uncertainty is highlighted by our findings on susceptibility, where a combined 48.33% of farmers agreed or strongly agreed that all poultry are susceptible, while a combined 26.67% disagreed and 25.00% were neutral. Similarly, a combined 61.667% of farmers disagreed or strongly disagreed that vaccination should be limited to laying birds, suggesting a more informed group, but a substantial 30% still held or were neutral on this opposing view.
The survey indicated a knowledge gap regarding crucial preventive measures, with only 25.00% consistently screening for maternal derived antibodies in new chicks. This points to a clear need for greater farmer orientation on these vital protocols.
A vast majority of respondents (95.00%) recognized the potential for economic losses due to IB. This perception aligns with established veterinary understanding, as IB is an acute, highly contagious viral infection known to cause adverse effects on egg quality, egg production, and significant growth depression . The disease's major economic impact stems from poor weight gain and compromised feed conversion ratios. Critically, losses resulting from diminished production performance are often a greater financial concern than those directly attributable to mortality . However, a significant minority of farmers (23.33%) were unaware of other potential causes for production drops beyond Newcastle disease and Egg Drop Syndrome , suggesting that IB's economic impact may still be underestimated.
5. Limitations of the Study
This study, while providing valuable insights, is subject to certain limitations. The reliance on a survey-based approach means that findings are based on self-reported data, which may be influenced by recall bias or a desire to present practices in a favorable light. Furthermore, the study's scope was limited to Federal Capital Territory, and while our findings align with broader national seroprevalence data, the results may not be generalizable to all poultry farming systems across Nigeria. Future research could benefit from a longitudinal design and the inclusion of serological testing to directly correlate farmer practices with flock health outcomes.
6. Conclusion
In conclusion, this study effectively illuminates the complex interactions between various farmer practices and their profound impact on the spread and control of Infectious Bronchitis. The identified gaps in knowledge, particularly concerning comprehensive vaccination protocols, disease recognition, and the importance of practices like maternal derived antibody screening, provide a clear roadmap for future educational and intervention strategies aimed at supporting the resilience and profitability of the Nigerian poultry industry.
Abbreviations

IB

Infectious Bronchitis

KAP

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices

FCT

Federal Capital Territory

ND

Newcastle Disease

IBD

Infectious Bursal Disease

IBV

Infectious Bronchitis Virus

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Adebayo, I. A. (2004) Application of Heterologous Erythrocyte Indicator Systems in the Differentiation of Vaccinal and Natural ND Induced Antibodies. Int. Jour. Poult. Sci. 3(6): 411-414.
[2] Adebayo, I. A., Adene, D. F., Tawe, O. M., and Durojaye, O. A. (2004). Mammalia erythrocytes indicator systems for Haemagglutination and Rapid diagnosis of ND. Trop. Vet. 22(1): 23 to 28.
[3] Adene, D. F., A. M. Wakawa, P. A. Abdu, L. H. Lombin, H. M. Kazeem, L. Sa’idu, M. Y. Fatihu, T. Joannis, C. A. O. Adeyefa and T. U. Obi, 2006. Clinicopathological and Husbandry Features Associated with the Maiden Diagnosis of Avian Influenza in Nigeria. Nig. Vet. J., 27: 32-38.
[4] Alexander D. J., and R. C. Jones, (2001): Paramyxoviridae. In: Jordan F., M. Pattison, D. J. Alexander, T. Faragher (ed.) Poultry Diseases, 5th edition, WB Saunders, Elsevier.
[5] Anosa G. N., and Adene D. F., “Comparative tissue reactivity of lentogenic strains of Newcastle disease vaccines in Nigeria,” Nigerian Veterinary Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 6–10, 2007.
[6] Baba, S. S., El-Yuguda, A. D. and Abubakar, M. B. (2007). Avian influenza in Nigeria: increasing spread with potentials for endemicity. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the association of Institutions of Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Montpellier, France, 19-22, August, 2007, pp 129.
[7] FAO, (2005). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation. Epidemiology of H5N1 Avian influenza in Asia and implications for Regional control. Morris, R. S. and R. Jackson (Eds.). Rome, Italy.
[8] Haruna, E. S. Musa, U, Lombin, L. H. Tat, P. B., And Molokwu J. u. (1997a). Introduction of quail production in Nigeria. Nigeria Veterinary Journal 18: 104-107.
[9] Liu, M., Guan, Y., Peiris, M., He, S., Webby, R. J., Perez, D., and Webster, R. G.(2003a). The quest of influenza A viruses for new hosts. Avian Dis 47(3 Suppl), 849-56.
[10] Oladele S. B., Abdu P., K. A. N. Esievo, A. J. Nok, and N. M. Useh, “Prevalence of Newcastle disease virus antibodies in chickens reared in Zaria,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of Nigerian Society of Animal Production, vol. 28, pp. 7–9, 2003.
[11] Perkins, L. E. L. and D. E. Swayne, 2003. Comparative susceptibility of selected avian and mammalian species to a Hong Kong origin H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus. Avian Dis., 47: 956-967.
[12] Senne, D. A., 2003. Avian influenza in the Western Hemisphere including the pacific Islands and Australia. Avian Dis., 47: 798 805.
[13] Silva Lima F., E. Santin, A. C. Paulillo, L. Doretto Jr., 2004, Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) as Newcastle Disease Virus carrier. International Journal of Poultry Science 3(7), 483-484.
[14] OIE World Organization for Animal Health. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. 6th ed. Paris: OIE; 2008.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Olamide, A. A., Adeyemi, A. O., Olatunde, O. H., Samuel, M., Onyilo, L. (2025). Understanding Attitude, Practice and Knowledge of Infectious Bronchitis Disease Among Poultry Farmers in Federal Capital Territory - Nigeria. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 13(6), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Olamide, A. A.; Adeyemi, A. O.; Olatunde, O. H.; Samuel, M.; Onyilo, L. Understanding Attitude, Practice and Knowledge of Infectious Bronchitis Disease Among Poultry Farmers in Federal Capital Territory - Nigeria. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2025, 13(6), 179-185. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Olamide AA, Adeyemi AO, Olatunde OH, Samuel M, Onyilo L. Understanding Attitude, Practice and Knowledge of Infectious Bronchitis Disease Among Poultry Farmers in Federal Capital Territory - Nigeria. Anim Vet Sci. 2025;13(6):179-185. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12,
      author = {Agbato Adeyinka Olamide and Agbato Oladapo Adeyemi and Olabode Hamza Olatunde and Mailafia Samuel and Lucky Onyilo},
      title = {Understanding Attitude, Practice and Knowledge of Infectious Bronchitis Disease Among Poultry Farmers in Federal Capital Territory - Nigeria},
      journal = {Animal and Veterinary Sciences},
      volume = {13},
      number = {6},
      pages = {179-185},
      doi = {10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.avs.20251306.12},
      abstract = {This study, involving 120 poultry farmers (82.00% male, 18.00% female) raising layers (63.00%), broilers (35.00%), and mixed flocks (2.00%) with sizes from 200 to 100,000 birds, investigated the interplay between knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) and the occurrence of Infectious Bronchitis (IB) in poultry. A critical observation was that vaccine administration, a key preventive measure, was often entrusted to farm attendants (45.00%) who may lack adequate understanding of biological material handling, potentially leading to vaccine failure and disease spread. While 45.00% of respondents limited their IB vaccination knowledge to laying birds, 55.00% understood its relevance to all bird types. Despite 95.00% acknowledging the economic impact of IB, 48.30% did not vaccinate against IB after 3-in-1 administration, and 23.30% had no vaccination history. Although all farmers kept medication records, only 25.00% consistently screened for maternal derived antibodies, a practice crucial for effective vaccination scheduling. Furthermore, a notable portion of farmers (15.00% strongly disagreed, 5.00% disagreed) lacked knowledge regarding the importance of priming birds before 3-in-1 vaccination. The findings show a critical need for increased awareness among poultry farmers, particularly concerning comprehensive vaccination protocols for all bird types, accurate disease recognition beyond clinical signs, and the significance of practices like maternal derived antibody screening to effectively mitigate IB and its economic consequences.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Understanding Attitude, Practice and Knowledge of Infectious Bronchitis Disease Among Poultry Farmers in Federal Capital Territory - Nigeria
    AU  - Agbato Adeyinka Olamide
    AU  - Agbato Oladapo Adeyemi
    AU  - Olabode Hamza Olatunde
    AU  - Mailafia Samuel
    AU  - Lucky Onyilo
    Y1  - 2025/11/28
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12
    T2  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    JF  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    JO  - Animal and Veterinary Sciences
    SP  - 179
    EP  - 185
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5850
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20251306.12
    AB  - This study, involving 120 poultry farmers (82.00% male, 18.00% female) raising layers (63.00%), broilers (35.00%), and mixed flocks (2.00%) with sizes from 200 to 100,000 birds, investigated the interplay between knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) and the occurrence of Infectious Bronchitis (IB) in poultry. A critical observation was that vaccine administration, a key preventive measure, was often entrusted to farm attendants (45.00%) who may lack adequate understanding of biological material handling, potentially leading to vaccine failure and disease spread. While 45.00% of respondents limited their IB vaccination knowledge to laying birds, 55.00% understood its relevance to all bird types. Despite 95.00% acknowledging the economic impact of IB, 48.30% did not vaccinate against IB after 3-in-1 administration, and 23.30% had no vaccination history. Although all farmers kept medication records, only 25.00% consistently screened for maternal derived antibodies, a practice crucial for effective vaccination scheduling. Furthermore, a notable portion of farmers (15.00% strongly disagreed, 5.00% disagreed) lacked knowledge regarding the importance of priming birds before 3-in-1 vaccination. The findings show a critical need for increased awareness among poultry farmers, particularly concerning comprehensive vaccination protocols for all bird types, accurate disease recognition beyond clinical signs, and the significance of practices like maternal derived antibody screening to effectively mitigate IB and its economic consequences.
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information